Would it make folks feel better about posting artwork, if we (the council) undertook to create versions of the art that has some kind of watermark on it? That would be difficult to remove, obviously.
That way, if people on Tumblr insisted on re-posting the art, instead of reblogging it (the latter preserves the info/credit it was posted with, or at least a link-back to our page or the page it was originally posted on), the key info is still on the art itself.
Like, here is an example of how I "watermarked" calendar artwork that we made available for download as a desktop version -- see the upper right on this page:
http://www.rivertwine.com/images/2013Ca ... 0x1050.jpgIt's fairly unobtrusive, and can't easily be removed without it being pretty obvious.
I'm attaching below an example of how a more minimal watermark could be added to some art.
However, it's not a perfect system. We have plenty of art that doesn't have a full background that a watermark could easily be added to.
For example, the second piece I just put below also has a watermark; but a really determined art thief could erase the portions that are against the white background, and what is left against Snowfall's leg isn't really enough to tell people where the art is from.
I don't want to minimize people's concerns about art theft -- but I do think that if you're going to post art on the internet at all (including on the RTH website), you have to develop a certain degree of acceptance that it *could* happen. The hope is that if it happens and we find out about it, we can take steps to deal with it; and Joan's right that the Tumblr art community does have some strong feelings about it and will often rally to help make clear that it isn't okay.
But I'm definitely happy to take steps to make things safer, including working out watermarking with individual artists.
It could be that if you're concerned about art theft, you limit those of your pieces that are posted to the ones that are most easily watermarked?